arguments and long fantastical sentences
07.20.04 (9:49 pm) [edit]Disclaimer: this is me being silly... dont take anything i say too seriously on the surface. there may be hidden elements below but dont say i put them there cause i will deny it. feel free to examine it and point out any mistakes though. im always out to improve
how many wood chucks does it take to clear out king henry's palace?? who knows what a wood chuck would think of him??? would a wood chuck just get up and leave cause his tail got trodden on??? would the elephant be angry is the wood chuck ate his peanuts??? why dont people just go out giving peanuts away instead of causing such rucuses by divorcing wives and chopping their heads off?? would the rich well built fellow in the big house up the end of the road past the dam and up through the acacia grove be plenty wealthy enough to spare a peanut or two... or more???
why cant he just get out more and see the world instead of being stuck in his little house?? why aren't there any penguins that far out into the woods?? why do pengins reside as humble mascots against the elephants who try to steal everyones peanuts?? is it possible that the man up top couldn't just take out his refidex and find his way down into town to talk to the little hobbitses who live down there putting stickers on everyone else???
is it better that the hobittses go off on horrible journeys to get rid of rings that the man up past the acacia grove could have destroyed by never giving peanuts to them to make them greedy??? would it really be unfunny if a hobbit stubbed his toe on a sharp stick left for him by the evil tree peoples?? would it be loyibilous for peoples to unite for the cause or should they take the high road that winds over the pass that leads to the lower world?? would the rules need rephrasing if a monster came out of the rabbits hole to defend against the lamb in dragons clothing?? would the words need to be sugarised for them to be swallowed or would protonisation be more desireable??
are people being made antiultraphysiliosic by my disturbing rhetoric?? who knows??
good night all!!!!
posted by: Dottie (reply)
post date: 07.20.04 (4:16 am)
Hmmm.... well, sounds interesting, maybe its just me but it went over my head *whoosh*... Oh well, I'm sure everyone else knows whats going on, I just talk in words with one syllable... its easier to understand! And whats antiultraphysiliosic? Did you use a thesaurus?
posted by: 02Babydoll (reply)
post date: 07.20.04 (4:44 am)
Urm... yer... lol. *just smile, nod and agree* :o)
posted by: ScarlettGKPi (reply)
post date: 07.20.04 (6:01 am)
Um....what to say in response to all that...nothing really other than ok...lol...take care of yourself ansell!
posted by: Gertrude (reply)
post date: 07.21.04 (1:52 am)
well...suprisingly a lot of that actually made sense! Except for the bit about "would the rich well built fellow in the big house " and then in the next sentence "why cant he just get out more and see the world instead of being stuck in his little house?"
Big house or little house? or does it even matter???
posted by: ansell (reply)
post date: 07.21.04 (4:15 pm)
Reply to: Gertrude
the big/little thing was there for a reason.
could you kindly explain to these other peoples what the rest meant in your opinion?? im sure they would love to know.
